This PhD thesis was submitted 4 May 2017, as the result of final corrections. Dr Sam McLean‘s award was ratified on 1 June 2017. This PhD thesis would not exist without the help of the many, many people who supported, encouraged, criticized, enabled and pushed me. Any attempt to thank you collectively would be woefully inadequate, and I intend to thank all of you in person as soon as possible.
At the Restoration of the English monarchy in 1660, Charles II inherited the existing interregnum navy. This was a persistent, but loosely defined organization that included a professional community of officers, a large number of warships, and substantial debts. From the beginning Charles II used royal prerogative to define the Royal Navy. In 1661, Parliament created legislation that simultaneously defined the English state and the Royal Navy. These actions closely linked the Royal Navy’s development to that of the English state, and the use of both statutes and conventions to define the Navy provided the foundation for its development in the Westminster Model.
This thesis considers the Royal Navy’s development from the Restoration to the replacement of the Articles of War in 1749 in five distinct periods. The analysis shows emphasizes both the consistency of process that resulted from the creation and adoption of definitions in 1660, as well as the substantial complexity and differences that resulted from very different institutional, political and geopolitical circumstances in each period.
The Royal Navy’s development consisted of the ongoing integration of structural and professional definitions created both in response to crises and pressures, as well as deliberate efforts to improve the institution. The Royal Navy was integrated with the English state, and became an institution associated with specific maritime military expertise, and the foundations laid at the Restoration shaped how the Navy’s development reflected both English state development and professionalization. In particular, the aspects of the Royal Navy that Charles II and Parliament respectively defined in 1660 provide important context for when first Parliament, then the Board of Admiralty later stepped outside those bounds.
The PDF can be downloaded Downloaded HERE
Well done, Sam, congratulations for completing such an important milestone after many years of hard work, a testament to your commitment and professionalim as a distinguished academic. And just in time for the summer! Take some well-deserved time off while I include your thesis as part of my summer readings, looking forward to learning more about a fascinating subject. BZ!
Pingback: Global Maritime History Discuss-A-Volume: NVT/8 Navigation workbook kept by William Downman, ca.1685-86 (Caird Library) - Global Maritime History