Global Maritime History are pleased to announce the conference programme for the Maritime Toxic Masculinity Digital Conference, which will go live on our website on Friday, April 26 at 8:30 EST. We are excited by the extensive range of topics that our presenters will be discussing. The digital conference format provides us with the flexibility to hear from a diverse group of speakers and to accommodate creative projects. We hope that those who are interested will follow the conference proceedings through the website and through the conference hashtag, #maritimetoxicmasc, on Twitter. We’ll be taking questions for the presenters on both Twitter and the website and are looking forward to a lively digital discussion.
Ankita Das: “War, Travel, and the Turmoiled Self: Narrative of an Odia Soldier”
Abstract: Travel is a highly multi-layered process that is determined by the traveller’s social class/ status and his purpose of travelling. While research has been carried out on Western travel writing, not much is known about travel within Asia. There exist accounts and narratives, though few in number about travel within Asia that involves a dialogical consciousness of the traveller’s gaze in the appropriations of imperialism. Two and a half billion soldiers from undivided India served the British colonisers during the 2nd World War. Their experiences, have remained unremembered for various reasons, neither in the U.K, where a Eurocentric memory of the war dominates, nor in South Asia, where nationalist histories of Independence from the British Empire still prevail. In the colonial era, many from India, especially from the coastal region of Odisha, migrated to Burma (Present day Myanmar) through maritime routes in search of better jobs, but among them a few were taken as part of the British army. Many travel accounts were written in various Indian languages- Hindi, Odia, Bengali, Urdu and Tamil and have been lost in time, all that remains are evocative textual remains- a portal into the soldiers’ world. This paper attempts to study the 2nd World War through the Asian lens- the Asian soldier’s dilemma of killing his own brothers, as part of the colonial enterprise. The study is based on Mayadhar Singh’s autobiography, Mu Military Re Thili (I was a Soldier), written in Odia. He very vividly remarks, “As I passed my days under the shadow of war that loomed large, another battle raged within me. I had not received a letter or any news from my home for a long time” (Mu Military Re Thili, Mayadhar Singh). The account, thus forges a material and emotional connection between the home front and warfront. It poignantly depicts the soldier’s assuaging loneliness, homesickness and a rather fascinating account of the colonial matrix, involving India, Burma and Japan. The image of the soldier penning down his thoughts remain a remarkable testament to the forgotten experiences of the Indian soldier and his experiences during the 2nd World War.
Bio: Ankita Das is a PhD Research Scholar at the Indian Institute of Information Technology, Guwahati, India. Her area of research and interest is British Colonial Travel Narratives in India. She is currently working on the journals of the Eden sisters and Maria Graham. Apart from this, she is also part of the Centre for Archiving and Translation, University of Delhi, India. Her interest in Travel Writing and literature grew after she enrolled for a 10 day course on Travel Writing: Texts, Theories and Framework, offered by Prof. Carl Thompson and Prof. Jatindra Nayak at IIT-Bhubaneswar in December 2016. Her other research interests include exploring travel narratives of lesser known Indian writers written in indigenous languages. She currently teaches Communicative English to students at the undergraduate level at IIIT Guwahati.
Dr. Johnathan Thayer: “Andrew Furuseth, the International Seamen’s Union, and the Political Ideology of Maritime Masculinity”
Abstract: Andrew Furuseth is commonly celebrated as an emancipatory figure in U.S. maritime history. As leader of the International Seamen’s Union and principle advocate for passage of the 1915 Seamen’s Act (the “Magna Carta of seamen’s rights”), the Norwegian-American former sailor was the most visible figure in the origins and early decades of maritime unionism in the U.S. Whereas the 1915 Seamen’s Act granted sailors the right to break contract without fear of imprisonment and codified a litany of regulations regarding working and living conditions at sea, close analysis of the political rhetoric that Furuseth and the ISU launched in advocating for the Act’s passage reveals an underlying ideology that sought to protect an ideal of the skilled maritime worker that conflated manliness with “skilled” labor reserved exclusively for white sailors. This ideal was presented at the turn of the 20th-century as being under siege from unskilled, mostly Asian maritime workers, against which the skilled, white maritime union stood as bulwark against the erosion of the industry’s crafts, and by extension, the livelihood (and manliness) of its members. This presentation will examine this rhetoric in detail, and will challenge the hagiographic legacy of Furuseth and the 1915 Seamen’s Act by focusing on a key ideological conflation of skilled maritime labor protectionism, xenophobia, racism, and manliness. Additionally, this presentation will consider the impacts of this ideology on American histories of maritime labor, immigration law, and collective maritime memory.
Bio: Johnathan Thayer (PhD, MLS) is Assistant Professor of Archival Studies at Queens College, City University of New York. He teaches courses in archival studies, public history, and digital history. He is also Senior Archivist at the Seamen’s Church Institute. Thayer’s research focuses on confrontations between merchant seamen and shoreside individuals, institutions, and the state. He is working on a book manuscript tentatively titled Sailors Ashore: Citizenship, Subversion, and Surveillance in U.S. Sailortowns.
Harry Brennan: “Masculine Violence in the lives of John Cremer (1700-1774) and William Byrd II (1674-1744)”
Abstract: A key facet of ‘toxic’ masculinity is the way in which codes of masculine behaviour often encourage violence and cruelty towards others. This can be an outward demonstration of manliness to others, a way to undermine female status, or an outlet for suppressed feelings of anxiety or shame. In this paper, I argue that this aspect of toxic masculinity can be traced in the early modern Atlantic using a dual case study: John Cremer (1700-1774) and William Byrd II (1674-1744). The two share little in common at first glance, besides the early eighteenth century overlap in their lifespans. However, a comparison of their experiences tells us much about toxic masculinity in the early modern Atlantic world. Cremer was low-born, raised on a range of naval and mercantile ships, and known as ‘Rambling Jack’. Forever getting into fights as a boy and as a sailor in the Mediterranean, he was often censured for his violent indiscretions. Byrd, on the other hand, was an Anglo-Virginian plantation owner, firmly amongst the elite. Traversing the Atlantic several times over his life, Byrd aggressively pursued women in London and unleashed violence on servants, slaves and native people back in Virginia. This paper examines how these men’s wildly differing lives at sea fuelled their violent masculinities, often frustrating their own ambitions in the process. Using Cremer’s journal and comparing it to Byrd’s diaries and written works, this dual case-study serves to illustrate how the violent aspects of toxic masculinity operated in the early modern Atlantic world.
Bio: Harry Brennan is a Brit and first-year PhD researcher at the University of Glasgow, examining how gender and identities developed in the early modern British Atlantic, c.1660-1760. His BA and MA degrees were completed at Cardiff University, where he developed an interest in early modern history, gender, and the study of masculinity. @harryajbrennan
Dr. Kelly MacPhail: “‘The horror of the race’: W.C. Williams’ ‘The Yachts’ and the 1934 America’s Cup”
Abstract: This paper takes as its starting point William Carlos Williams’ oft anthologized 1935 modernist poem “The Yachts.” What at first glance appears to be a simple poem about a sailboat race in fact reveals manifold intersections of virulently toxic masculinity stemming primarily from testosterone infused competition, markers of economic class, nationalistic pride, and even the early military industrial complex’s preparations for war. The text itself is roughly divided into two parts. The first section evocatively narrates a race between large, powerful yachts while the second takes a dark turn as waves lapping at the side of the yachts become “Arms with hands grasping seek to clutch at the prows. Bodies thrown recklessly in the way are cut aside. / It is a sea of faces about them in agony, in despair / until the horror of the race dawns staggering the mind” (lines 25-29). Given Williams’ condemnation here of the extravagant, leisurely past time of superrich men competing and sailing blithely past the terrible sufferings of the poor masses, the text is indeed a jeremiad against both the cruel indifference of rich men and also the capitalist economic system that allows such massive gaps between rich and poor to exist and widen. However, the race’s significance goes further, as Williams is referring particularly to the 1934 America’s Cup race, which he witnessed firsthand in Newport, Rhode Island, between the New York Yacht Club as represented by Harold S. Vanderbilt and his J-class sloop Rainbow against the Royal Yacht Squadron challenger represented by Sir Thomas Sopwith, who built his modified J-class sloop Endeavour especially for the purpose. Competition was fierce and went beyond good-natured ribbing because personal and national pride was at stake, and both teams spared no expense to win, a feat open only to men of the highest economic class. Vanderbilt used his inherited fortune to build the best boat from the best shipyard with the best materials, even including a special new steel alloy christened “duralumin.” Likewise, Sopwith was a rich industrialist well known for the aeroplanes he built, most notably the iconic World War I Sopwith Camel and World War II’s Hawker fighters. Sopwith applied his aeronautics expertise to Endeavour, making changes to hull, sails, and mast based on the aerodynamics of plane wings. While the yacht itself would not appear to be a weapon of war, such technological experiments were communicated to wartime armaments. Obviously, both men would not only foot the bill but also go man-to-man by skippering their yachts in the races, though Sopwith found himself at a disadvantage when his professional crew went on strike in response to his strong-arm tactics and refusal to pay them a competitive wage. Ironically, both boats turned out to be disposable despite their enormous price tags. Rainbow was scrapped after Vanderbilt ordered a brand new boat for the 1937 America’s Cup. Endeavour, described at the time as “the perfect yacht,” languished in a scrapyard until being restored in 1984. These big J-class racing yachts were a high point in technological advancement, speed, beauty, and luxury, but their very existence at a moment in the Great Depression when some 15 million Americans were unemployed and nearly half the country’s banks had failed made them a telling symbol of the blithe indifference of rich men and their undiluted, competitive, and toxic masculinity.
Bio: Dr. Kelly MacPhail is an Assistant Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth, where he teaches Philosophy and English. His interdisciplinary research focuses on Transatlantic literary modernism, environmental criticism, and belief studies, and he has published on subjects as diverse as animal domestication, Puritan sermons, film noir, and the Western. In this presentation, Kelly combines his research interests in modernist poetry with his experiences as a competitive sailor on Lake Superior.
Dr. Jessica Floyd: “Shaping a Hyper-Masculine Sailing Identity: Sex, Violence, and Otherness in Examples of “Blow the Man Down” Located in the James Madison Carpenter Collection”
Abstract: “Blow the Man Down” is one of the most prolific sea chanteys in circulation and examples of the song are located in almost every published and archival chantey repository known to researchers. In fact, Frederick Pease Harlow, in his collection of chanteys and sailors’ songs mentions that “It [“Blow the Man Down”] has been sung so often that the words are legion” (1962). Sea chanteys were the work songs that the sailor employed when he was at work. Created and commenced by the chantey-man, a man on ship who was prized for his voice as well as his wit, chanteys often represent the collective salt water world of sailors and provide space to vent frustrations, access and assuage longing, and mitigate idiosyncrasies of the sailing life that often rendered Jack Tar (slang for sailor) a man far outside the expectations of the land-bound world. The sailor, afloat in his watery workspace, lived a liminal existence in which he was tied to both land and sea and, because of this, was a man often pulled in both directions at the same time. I argue that the consequence of this pull was that the sailing man was left with trying to conceive of a masculinity that allowed him to function within both of those spaces while maintaining masculine power and agency. What is showcased, at least in some examples of “Blow the Man Down,” is that the sailor’s masculine performance was often interrupted by external forces and the man was rendered, in these fictitious spaces, a subordinated character that falls outside of masculine expectations. This paper investigates the way in which struggles of masculine construction arise in spaces like the sailor’s sea chantey and ventures the argument that the narrative examples located in the James Madison Carpenter Collection showcase the frustration of sailors when their masculine performance clashes with the lived reality of their subordinated existence. Through a close analysis of examples of “Blow the Man Down” located in the Carpenter Collection, it is clear that sailing men articulated the knowledge that a masculine man must be strong, authoritative, and self-possessed; however, the sailing characters often encounter situations in which their performance of masculinity is thwarted and they are subordinated to crafty women, violent and capricious captains and mates, and to the close confines of the ship itself. The sailor’s life was one where he was often at the mercy of each of these (women, captains and mates, and the carceral quality of his wooden workspace) and he catalogues the failings of his masculine performances in places where he would share them with fellow sailing men who inevitably experienced the same frustrations. Ultimately, this paper makes the argument that objects like sea chanteys provide the opportunity for scholars to investigate myriad aspects of the maritime world, one of which is the complex construction of masculinity present on the high seas. Chiefly, the liminal quality of sailing men’s lives had a direct impact on the construction and maintenance of masculine identity.
Bio: Dr. Jessica Floyd is Coordinator and Assistant Professor of English at the Community College of Baltimore County. Her research deals with the narratives of chanteys (sailing work songs of the sea) and how they evoke expressions of gender, sexuality, identity, and history.
Dr. Joshua M. Smith: “Those human seraphim, the sailors”: Beatnik Merchant Seamen, 1942-1965
Abstract: The image of the twentieth century merchant mariner is not firmly set in the American public’s mind, but if I had to nominate a picture, it would be a black and white photo of Allen Ginsberg on the fantail of the SS John Blair, leaning on the stern flagpole, smoking a joint and taking in the view as the ship entered New York harbor in October, 1947. Ginsberg was of course the very embodiment of non-conformity, a libertine poet whose poem “Howl” changed American poetry even as it gave an anthem to the many Americans deeply dissatisfied with a society that demanded conformity and a government highly suspicious of alternative viewpoints, politics, religions, sexualities, and writers in general. Ginsberg was suspect because he differed from the American mainstream in virtually every conceivable way. Not only was he raised Jewish, with leftist politics, he was gay, an intellectual, and a writer, and also a merchant mariner, a profession that was little respected by the public. Ginsberg proofread his seminal “Howl” while working on board the SS Sergeant Jack J. Pendleton in 1956, a Military Sea Transportation Service (MSTS) ship that run between the West Coast and Cold War radar stations in the Alaskan arctic.In that poem, Ginsberg refers to seamen as “those human Seraphim, the Sailors,” meaning they were angels, at least to him, but only a naïf would believe he was talking about ocean breezes when he wrote: “who blew and were blown by those human/ seraphim, the sailors, caresses of Atlantic and Caribbean love.”
Ginsberg was but one of the so-called “Beatniks” who intermittently worked on American cargo vessels during the Second World War and after (the preferred term is Beats). The Beats were a collection of artists, writers, and free thinkers in general who challenged prevailing ideas about virtually everything. They defied the cultural norms of the day by propounding an antimaterialistic lifestyle, shocking conventional society with their sexual freedom, substance abuse, and of course their poetry and prose, and sometimes drew the ire of the law for their supposedly obscene publications. But the Beatniks were continually scrabbling to make ends meet, and work on ships not only offered escape from the prevailing prejudices of shoreside society, it also offered decent money, the opportunity to travel, and potentially experiences to write about. Indeed, Ginsberg was following a path pursued by his friend Jack Kerouac, author of another seminal Beatnik work, On the Road. Both Ginsberg and Kerouac had a West Coast friend who also influenced contemporary American poetry, Gary Snyder. Because they were men of letters and were unusually bold or honest in their writing about the earthier elements of the experiences and desires of young men, they offer insights into the seafaring life. This approach has been used successfully by historians looking at nineteenth century seafarers. In particular, Myra C. Glenn noted in her work that studying mariners whose lives were “marginal, even deviant,” could explain how mainstream society defined “acceptable codes of masculinity, and how it regarded and treated men who violated these codes.” Taken together, the maritime careers of these three Beats, who were certainly regarded as marginals and deviants, reveal patterns about American seafaring workers’ relationship to American society in the mid-twentieth century.
Bio: Joshua M. Smith grew up on Cape Cod and coastal Maine. He holds degrees from the University of St. Andrews, East Carolina University, and the University of Maine. He is author of “Borderland Smuggling: Patriots, Loyalists, and Illicit Trade in the Northeast, 1783-1820,” which won the John Lyman Award in American Maritime History in 2007, and edited “Voyages: Documents in American Maritime History, 1492-Present,” a two-volume sourcebook in maritime history created in conjunction with the National Maritime Historical Society. He has also written a small monograph with a Canadian perspective entitled “Battle for the Bay: The Naval War of 1812,” published by the Gregg Centre for the Study of War and Society. He is currently writing a monograph on Maine and the War of 1812 entitled “Yankee Doodle Upset.” Smith lives with his family on Long Island, and is a professor of Humanities at the United States Merchant Marine Academy, as well as Director of the American Merchant Marine Museum, both in Kings Point, New York.
Mitch Gould: “Sailors: the Wheels on Melville’s Coach”
Abstract: Maritime historians appreciate that any favorable literary reference to sailors made the self-appointed guardians of Victorian morality very, very, uneasy. “Father” Edward Thompson Taylor once snarled at his Methodist handlers: “I remember when you kept a man at the door of your churches to shut out those who wore a tarpaulin hat and a blue jacket.” The Respectable position was that sailors chose to become pariahs by indulging their own self-destructive propensities: boozing, gambling, brawling, dancing, overspending, and whoring — contributing, if nothing else, to the city’s epidemic of venereal disease. Even the outrageous privations, harsh discipline, grueling labor, and high danger necessarily associated with the occupation were understood to be self-destructive. In Redburn, Herman Melville astutely identified the heart of the problem as a sailor’s intrinsically reckless, restless, thrill-seeking personality. Melville intuitively understood that what modern psychologists call “sensation-seeking behavior” resulted in a distinct “class” of men “who bear the same relation to society at large, that the wheels do to a coach.” Brashly alluding to yet another manifestation of recklessness to which The Respectable could “hardly bear even so much as an allusion,” Melville’s White-Jacket exposed a poorly-kept secret about these pariahs: “The sins for which the cities of the plain were overthrown still linger in some of these wooden-walled Gomorrahs of the deep.” It has been easy for modern critics to ignore this passage from Melville’s work of fiction, but a few years later, the Navy published official confirmation. One ship’s doctor, writing anonymously, affirmed the sheer prevalence of the phenomena and the refusal of officers to address it. My presentation suggests that the time for arguing over whether or not sailors were mutually sexually engaged is over; the evidence is conclusive. The problem that lies before us now is to understand how capitalists exploited a sensation-seeking labor force, in analogy to their lucrative extraction of timber, fish, and minerals from the natural world. What economic value could be assigned to the kind of hypersexuality being studied in modern-day sensation-seekers, among both strait and gay populations?
Bio: Mitchell Santine Gould is an independent scholar, engaged in illuminating the Sailor : Lover : Quaker world of antebellum Manhattan, which gave birth to Walt Whitman and Leaves of Grass. His work has been published in Walt Whitman: an Encyclopedia, Quaker History, and Quaker Theology. Since 2003, he has used https://LeavesofGrass.Org — initially as a blog — to instantly share the results of historical discoveries in the Internet’s swelling collection of digitized books and journals. He was collecting evidence to prove his Sailor : Lover : Quaker hypothesis, based upon the proposition that it was no coincidence that Leaves of Grass was introduced at the very pinnacle of The Age of Sail. Of interest to Global Maritime History readers will be his most recent contribution: the first in-depth survey of the central role of antebellum Quakers in the meteoric rise of the Port of New York. His work has been published in Walt Whitman: an Encyclopedia, Quaker History, and Quaker Theology.
Dr. Jo Stanley: “Tackling the silences about women’s subjective sexuality in maritime histories”
Abstract: Covering the UK merchant and royal navies in the period up to today’s #MeToo climate, this paper explores three aspects of the silences in maritime history about seafaring women’s subjective sexualities. After proposing some definitions it outlines some of the matters that could and should be discussed, for example some women’s non-heterosexuality and the impact of stigmatizing sexually transmitted diseases. Pregnant stewardess Ellen Gibbs and the magistrate’s joke that she and her husband had not been asked to sign a no-sex-at-sea contract is seen as an important 1857 expression of normally occluded matter.
Then the many reasons why there have been silences are discussed: for example academic fear of scandal and the possible consequent withdrawing of public fund; and women’s reticence in the face of salaciousness, plus repeated exclusion of women’s voices in general records. Reasons are given for why this silence matters in maritime historiography, such as that absence creates imbalanced records. Finally several examples of a 21st century climate are discussed, such as labour union fight-backs against sexual harassment; the Sex and Sea exhibition currently in Tallinn; and the recent speaking out about maritime masculinities, which will surely bring corresponding work on maritime femininities. The author concludes that the on-board failure to respect women as equals and subjects has been toxic.
Bio: Dr. Jo Stanley researches and writes about the history of women, black and LGBTQI+ people in maritime life. She is Senior Visiting Research Fellow at Liverpool John Moores University and her most recent book is Women and the Royal Navy(2017). See also her article ‘On Buffer-kissers, Bus-station Skanks and Mile-high Clubs: Sexualities and Transport, in Mobilities in History, 2013
Meaghan Walker: “The Issuing of Such Coarse Stuff to the People”: What the Contents of the British Tender Diligent Reveal about Gendered Relationships and Labour, Clothing Systems, and Imperial Power, 1804.
In the 2005 history monograph Nelson’s Surgeon by Laurence Brockliss, John Cardwell, and Micheal Moss, there is a short section on clothing and health, largely supported by a series of letters between Captain Hardy, Admiral Horatio Nelson, and the Admiralty board in 1804. In a strongly worded letter, Nelson expressed his deep disappointment in the slop clothing which had recently arrived on the tender Diligent. Through Nelson, Hardy also submitted for the Admiralty’s approbation a series of garments made of locally manufactured Maltese cotton, asking if a contract might be made to instead supply the Mediterranean fleet with these garments.
The historians of Nelson’s Surgeonwrote of this exchange that “Hardy resembled a protective, thrifty matron fussing over her children” and that Nelson shared his “almost mother-like concern for the sailors under his command.”In a book discussing healthcare in a homosocial shipboard environment, where officers and sailors formed important combat bonds in part through the negotiation of labour by one part in exchange for paternal care and leadership by the other, these reactions are significant—and troubling.
How did Nelson’s almost hypermasculine outrage over the poorly made slops—a letter where he suggested hanging the Navy Board and threatened the mutiny of his crew—become “mother-like concern” in the eyes of three male historians?
This submission will explore the paternal relationships forged in the navy through the supply and regulation of clothing—relationships not only between officers, but also between administrators and crew. It will also discuss the nature of homosocial ship-life: few maritime historians have integrated gender as an appropriate theoretical framework for understanding shipping because women were not present, but despite this, as seen in the above example, assumptions about the gendered nature of certain types of on-board work and relationships remained. Further, by discussing the contents of three letters about the Diligent’s slop clothes, and the wider politics of sourcing clothing in the British Navy between 1793 and 1815, this paper will show the significance of clothing in the Navy as not only an interesting afterthought, but as an important cornerstone of crew relationships, manufacturing prowess in Britain and abroad, and of British imperial policy and rhetoric.
Laurence Brockliss, William Beatty, and Michael Moss, Nelson’s Surgeon: William Beatty, Naval Medicine, and the Battle of Trafalgar(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 90-91.
Bio: Meaghan Walker is a doctoral candidate at the University of Alberta. She has done considerable research into the clothing of merchant seafarers in the late nineteenth century, and, currently, the military dress of sailors and marines in the Royal Navy during the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. Her focus on clothing has allowed her to explore the complex lives of seafarers and their material culture on land and sea, where dynamics of gender, class, and empire played out as the components of clothes moved around the world on merchant vessels protected by the Royal Navy, and then the finished products were put in the hands of seafarers through the sailortown economy or via the British government’s systems of slop clothes and uniform production and supply. Ms. Walker has an upcoming publication in the International Journal of Maritime History called “The Inventories of Deceased British Merchant Seafarers: Exploring Merchant Shipping and Material Culture, 1860-1880.”
Panel Four: The Docks: Semiotic Examination of Masculinity and Sexual Constructs Surrounding the Lone Sailor
Steven Dashiell (lead organizer), Dorian Alexander, Kyle Shupe, and Angus Henderson: “The Docks: Semiotic Examination of Masculinity and Sexual Constructs Surrounding the Lone Sailor”
Abstract: The purpose of this panel is to examine the historic and symbolic role of two concepts, the docks and the sailor, and how they have contributed to masculinity performances and expectations among both homosexual and heterosexual men. There has been a lore surrounding the “lonely docks” and the sailor who is seeking sexual release after his time on the sea. While the imagery is highly sexualized, the setting and activity do not directly speak to the sexuality of the participants, but more to the nature of the public sex environment. The sailor, or more specifically, the navy sailor, then becomes a complex masculine figure; displayed in a manner that highlights his manhood and hardy nature, while desirous of contact with other men via sexual release. While examination of the public sex environment and the men who partake in it gives some insight into how men who do not wish to be openly homosexual interact, there is less knowledge about the norms and roles those participants perform. The grey nature of the docks as a sexual space, and the sailor as a participant, allows for any who participate to engage in behaviors that might be more toxic, as there is a deniability factor of engagement from all sides.
Bios: Dorian Alexander teaches history at Seattle Central College, specializing in queer history and representations of the past in popular culture. He is one of the editors for Drawing the Past: Comics and the Historical Imagination, an upcoming book series exploring how comics shape our understanding of history, and writes historical comics for The Nib. He was recently accepted into the PhD program at University of Washington in English Literature.
Steven Dashiell is a doctoral candidate at the University of Maryland Baltimore County in the Language, Literacy and Culture Department. His research looks specifically at male-dominated subcultures and the discourses and practices that occur in spaces commonly associated with men. He has academic publishing on the Geek Anthropologist and the online journal Analog Game Studies.
Angus Henderson is a recent graduate of Oklahoma State University’s Art History undergraduate program with an emphasis on LGBT Visual Culture. His current research is on the impact of Tom of Finland on the formation of modern American gay culture. Most recently, he accepted a summer residency at the Queer Zine Archive Project in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Kyle Shupe is a PhD student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Cincinnati. His research interests are in gender and sexual identities, dating apps, and the sociology of desire. In his current work, he examines the social organization of desirability in queer men’s communities. He is an Assistant Editor at Social Problems.
The conference organizers would like to thank all of the speakers for their participation, and Megann Licskai for her special technical assistance.